Showing posts with label series. Show all posts
Showing posts with label series. Show all posts

Monday, April 6, 2015

Rush Hour film series

The Rush Hour film series is a series of Hong Kong-American martial arts/action- comedy films starring Jackie Chan and Chris Tucker, directed by Brett Ratner, and distributed by New Line Cinema. The main plot centers on a pair of police detectives: a Hong Kong Police Force inspector and an American LAPD detective (portrayed by Chan and Tucker) who go on a series of misadventures often involving corrupt crime figures. All three films achieved commercial success and incorporate elements of martial arts and the buddy cop sub-genre. 


Rush Hour was released on September 18, 1998 grossing $244,386,864 worldwide.  Martin Lawrence and Dave Chappelle were originally considered for the role of James Carter, but Chris Tucker was finally chosen for the part. Director Brett Ratner, a big fan of Jackie Chan's Hong Kong movies, felt that American audiences would not be familiar with the jokes in Jackie's other movies, and deliberately re-used some of his gags. For example, the scene where Inspector Lee accidentally grabs Detective Johnson's (Elizabeth Peña) breasts is a reference to Jackie Chan's film Mr. Nice Guy (1997).  Jackie Chan, fortunately, did win over the hearts of the audience.  Many people found him hilarious, and a great actor. 


Rush Hour 2 was released on August 3, 2001. The film grossed $347,325,802 worldwide, making it the most successful film in the Rush Hour series. In an interview, director Brett Ratner admitted that the first part of the karaoke scene with Chris Tucker was not supposed to be filmed. Tucker refused to act like Michael Jackson with the cameras running. During takes, he went up as entertainment for everyone. Secretly, Ratner told the cameramen to film it but to not let Tucker notice them. On an episode of The Tonight Show with Jay Leno, Tucker said that while he was filming this movie in Hong Kong, many locals mistook him for NBA star Kobe Bryant. In the film, while Tucker's character is running up the stairs, the old woman shouts, "Move out of the way, Kobe" to him. This film obviously had a very strong cast and crew connection, which is key for a well-made film to be produced.  It also creates the feel-good emotion that comes with great films. The mural on the wall of the Heaven on Earth Massage Parlor was copied from one in Scarface, which Harris Yulin and Ratner appeared in. It is funny to see a parody take place in such a popular film.  The scene where Jackie Chan and Tucker are running down the street naked in Hong Kong was an actual take; production could not block the street off for the shoot. The scene where Chan and Tucker run in the streets was inspired by a scene in The Accidental Spy (2001) which Chan made before this movie. Ratner saw the film and decided to include a similar scene in Rush Hour 2 (2001).  Although this film incorporates a lot from past films, it was very well put together, and obviously, the public reacted positively to it.  

Rush Hour 3 was officially announced on May 7, 2006, and filming began on July 4, 2006. The film, set in Paris and Los Angeles, was first released on August 10, 2007, and grossed $258,022,233 worldwide. Academy Award-winning film director Roman Polanski co-stars as a French police official involved in Lee and Carter (Chan and Tucker's characters) case.  This movie, said by most audiences, did not live up to the expectations of the last two movies in the series.  Rush Hour 3 was literally, rushed, and not as well made, I believe.  The story and plot could have been executed better. All in all though, it was a good third movie to a big series.  


Because of the films' collective box-office success, director Brett Ratner and writer Jeff Nathanson were considering the production of a fourth installment. In the DVD audio commentary for Rush Hour 3, Brett Ratner joked that the fourth Rush Hour film could be released in 2012. Ratner and Nathanson are exploring many concepts, including the use of the motion capture technique for the possible sequel and various different film projects with Chan and Tucker. It has been reported that the fourth film may be set in Moscow.  Although I think that this series has had its run, and maybe they should just leave the legacy of the great movies alone, I don't think I would mind seeing a Rush Hour 4.  I would not like to see actors that are not Chan and Tucker.  To conclude, I think they should just leave it as is and count their blessings.  


This series was hilarious and is a must see for everyone who loves comedies!  Chan's stunts are impeccable and fun to watch.  Tucker's humor ties it all together in a fun, feel good, action-comedy. 

Monday, March 2, 2015

The Arrested Development Pilot: One of the best pilots EVER

Arrested Development aired it's pilot on FOX on November 2nd, 2003. Since then, throughout its four seasons, the show has received 6 Emmy Awards, a Golden Globe Award, and recognition for being one of the funniest shows aired on television.

In my personal opinion, the pilot of this show is one of the strongest pilots for a television series I have ever seen. Typically, pilots are ruled out to not be considered the best, but this show breaks that rule. In this episode, you are introduced to every important character in the series. The main character, Michael Bluth, played by Jason Bateman, narrates the episode and gives a detailed description of his highly dysfunctional family members. The fast paced editing and highly saturated coloring make the episode even more intriguing to watch. Lower thirds are used as well as many graphics to point to certain things and create different vectors.

Another aspect that I found interesting is that when they go from one setting to another, they don't just cut it, they create two different boxes on the screen and then bring the next scene into full. I have never seen that done on a TV sitcom before. The dialogue that is used is absolutely hysterical and the conflicts that arrive are so coincidental and unrealistic that they make you laugh out loud. The killer cast of Jason Bateman, Michael Cera, Portia de Rossi, Will Arnett, and many more add hilarious antics with each of their lines. Overall, this pilot was incredible and really set a high standard for situational comedies.

Monday, February 23, 2015

Every Tuesday is PLL Day

Every Tuesday I scramble to my TV to watch my favorite series, Pretty Little Liars. The story focuses on four teenage girls, Aria Montgomery, Spencer Hastings, Emily Fields, and Hanna Marin and their daily struggle of getting blackmailed by an anonymous harasser.

The plot started the night that their so called friend, Alison Dilaurentis went missing. From there on out they have received various texts, threats, and have almost gotten killed a numerous amount of times. The mystery of the show is to find out who "A" is, but it never seems to go in their favor. When they think they have finally discovered the true person hiding behind "A's" black hoodie, another twist is thrown at them. Filled with drama, intense love stories, and relatable characters, Pretty Little Liars excels at being an amazing teen television show. Though I absolutely love this show, I sometimes ask the question, "when is it too much?" The plot of this show takes many twists and turns that sometimes are even confusing to the viewers. Pretty Little Liars has been approved for seven seasons, while currently being in their fifth. However, I can't see where they are going to take this show for two more seasons after they reveal who head "A" is at the end of season five.
There just comes a point in a show, where the writing becomes too complicated. There are so many side plots and characters that appear for such a short amount of time, that you don't know what is important anymore. Pretty Little Liars has made a significant impact on the expectations of a teen drama, and I think that they need to get back on the right track that they started on in the beginning of the series. This show is amazing and doesn't get enough credit for what it's worth. I think if they tightened up the plot,and focused on what was important, the show would be appealing to all audiences and not just the teenage realm. But don't get me wrong, I love my girls. 

Thursday, February 19, 2015

Marco Polo

Marco Polo is an American-made Historical drama that is based on the real life events of a famous Venetian merchant. Marco Polo is infamous for traveling across all of Asia where he eventully meets the Mongolian emperor Kublai Khan, learning the mercantile trade from his Father and Uncle along the way. Polo is kept as an honored captive of the Khan due to his knowledge of Asian trade routes and culture. We follow Marco Polo as he struggles to survive in the foreign Mongolian culture where almost every character, other than the Khan, seems to be attempting to take his life.


This Netflix original series was written and created by John Fusco, starring Lorenzo Richelmy as Marco Polo and Benedict Wong and the great emperor Khan. The first thing that I wish to discuss about this show is how well it teaches the audience about an era in history that is not commonly discussed. Everyone has heard of how Genghis Khan created the Mongolian empire and conquered most of Eurasia after uniting the tribes of Northeastern Asia. I thought it was interesting how this show covers what happens during a later, lesser known generation of the Mongolian reign. Kublai Khan created what is now referred to as the Yuan dynasty, a rich and prosperous time for the Mongolian people. I loved how this show follows Marco Polo, an outsider, as he attempts to learn how to survive in this new culture. As our main character learns more about this new culture the audience is indirectly introduced to these pieces of history as well.


One critique I have for this show is how a huge opportunity was passed when the creators had Marco Polo thrown into captivity so quickly. Not even 5 minutes into the first episode and he was already kneeling at the feet of Kublai Khan. If the writers had delayed this plot point and we had been shown Polo's life before he was taken captive it would have shown a much greater contrast between his living situations, eventually showing a much greater development in his character. While I may have this small complaint about the character Marco Polo, I overall really enjoyed Lorenzo Richelmy's performance.


There are many things that I truly believe this show did extraordinarily well. The cinematography was, at times, beautifully done. The sets were luxurious and grand in scale, accurately depicting the wealth of the Mongolian empire at the time. I thought that the show had a strong cast and was well acted. While the plot may have been a tad bit confusing due to the quick start I believe it was interesting. This is a show that I would recommend if you're interested in the historical drama. I would rate it a 6/10.

(There has been a lot of controversy with this show over the inaccurate depiction and extreme sexualization of women during the Mongolian Empire. If you want to read more about it click here)

'Real World: Skeletons' The 30th Season

I haven't watched a lot of MTV shows in the past few years, but the other day I was looking through Hulu and came across the new season of The Real World. I thought I would give it a try because during my teen years I used to enjoy other seasons of The Real World and it has been a while since I watched reality TV.

Many of us are familiar with the premise of The Real World, where a group of people that don't know each other live in the same house for serval months while it is documented by an MTV crew. This show starts with seven new roommates who all seem like they just want to have a good time, even though they might not get along with each other all the time. What is new about this season is that  after the first few episodes where the roommates get to somewhat know each other; MTV starts bringing a "Skeleton" from one of the cast member's past. A "Skeleton" in the show has pretty much been a person that would be one of the last people you would ever want to see again, that shows up to the house and typically, immediately starts new drama!
MTV is trying to create more drama by bringing in a house guest that they know the cast will not be happy to see.  As entertaining as this show is I feel like it has to be scripted or the producers tell the cast members what to do to some extent.  What I find weird about this season is that there seems to be a phone in the house that is a connect line to the producers, several times a cast member will pick up the phone and complain to the producers which feels weird while watching a reality TV show.  Also it seems a little set up the way the cast members talk about something and then what they were speculating actually happens moments after, this could be just the way it is edited but I still believe the cast members know more about what is going on then they lead you to believe.  I decided to keep watching the show because it is entertaining and I watched enough episodes where I want to see what happens next as well as see how the cast will survive the "Skeletons".

I'm not going to rate this show on a scale because I feel like you watch this show to be entertained and can't really take this show too seriously.

If you love drama, cat fights, raw emotions, and reality TV then this show would be the one for you!

Friday, March 28, 2014

The Office(s)

I'm a sucker for sitcoms, especially sitcoms done mockumentary style.  Shows like Parks and Recreation, Modern Family, and Trailer Park Boys are among some of my favorite mockumentary-style sitcoms.  One of television's greatest sitcoms, The Office, also took advantage of the comedic spin this style offers shows. Michael Scott (played by Steve Carell) is a regional manager at Dunder Mifflin, a paper company in Scranton, PA.  The show follows him and his employees through their day-to-day lives in and sometimes outside of the office.





Over the years, there has been much debate between TV fans over the "better" version of The Office: the US or the UK version?  Perhaps it's because I first watched the US version, but I prefer The Office: US over The Office: UK.  This is not to say one is better than the other.  They're both excellent shows, and the UK version contains (in my opinion) better acting and a more realistic setting/reactions. Despite this, I find myself drawn to the American version.  They illustrate a more present/in-your-face type of humor, versus more subtle comedy in the UK version. I enjoy the silliness of the characters; Michael Scott is quirky, ignorant, and sometimes downright stupid.  His employees have contrasting personalities all over the board, from Angela's strict charisma to Dwight's nerdiness to Kevin's idiocy.  In comparison to the UK version, the characters in the US version are much more dynamic and exaggerated. This creates hilarious dilemmas and causes ago clashes within the office. 


While both shows have almost identical settings, characters, and story-lines, they're completely different in terms of tone. The Office: US hooks viewers by layering moments of sincerity within the humorous structure.  The show transitions focus to the characters and their personal lives as the seasons progress.  We follow Pam Beasley's love life as she struggles to choose between Roy Anderson and Jim Halpert; we watch Jim build up his dream business; we see Michael obsessively strive to create friendships and relationships.



The last episode aired almost a year ago, on May 16, 2013, and The Office: US unfortunately came to end.  Luckily, Netflix has all 9 seasons ready to be watched!  It also has the UK version of the show. The length of The Office: US series would make one believe that is was the better (or at least more popular) show, but that's for you to decide for yourself.  The first season of both versions of the show are nearly identical (literally -- script, blocking, framing, etc. is all the same).  Try watching the different versions back-to-back and you'll see the differences in the tones of the show.  Which version do you prefer?


                                         The Office: US cast                   The Office: UK cast

Friday, March 7, 2014

Vice

Vice is a documentary television series that explores a variety of groundbreaking stories around the world.  There are different hosts depending on the topic and segment, including the shows founder Shane Smith.  




Vice takes a unique and personal approach to political and cultural topics.  Rolling Stone wrote that it "feels a little like your buddy from the bar just happened to be wandering through eastern Afghanistan with a camera crew."  The audience can truly feel the raw emotion being captured on screen.  The topics range from child suicide bombers to the world's most dangerous drug, scopolamine.  Each episode is so enlightening, and honestly, incredibly risky.  The camera crews aren't always welcomed, and these men risk their lives in their attempt to show us what life is really like on the other side.   
Vice began as an HBO documentary series, but luckily is now available for free via YouTube.  


Friday, February 14, 2014

A Strong Female Lead: Weeds

Although it is definitely becoming more common for television shows to have a strong female lead, I think that Weeds is one of the best examples of this. If you are not very familiar with the show, Nancy Botwin is a newly widowed mom of two boys from the upper-class suburban community of Agrestic. To deal with the financial issues that have been left to her, and to maintain her wealthy lifestyle, Nancy decides to become a drug dealer. This show follows her, her family, and the crew of miscreants that surround her, as she struggles to sustain her image, yet change it all at the same time. Nancy quickly finds herself in to deep, and when I began watching this show, I was ready to give up hope for her in the first couple of episodes. But the situations that she gets herself into are what make this show so interesting. She always seems to pull things together, even in the worst-case scenarios. What is so great (at least in the first three seasons) is that even her predicaments are always surprising and complex. The writing in the show is quite original and all the while it keeps Nancy’s integrity.


The one complaint that I do have about this show is the quality of the later seasons. Eventually it becomes difficult to sympathize with Nancy, and it is hard to believe that she is making choices for the sake of her family and not herself. Besides the later seasons decreasing in quality, I think that the first three seasons of Weeds are some of TVs finest. The show is entertaining, funny, takes plenty of risks, and has an incredibly strong Weeds a chance.
female lead. To anyone who is interested, I would definitely give

Thursday, January 30, 2014

Why Binge Watching is Better

Our whole lives we are taught that you can't do it all in a night. You shouldn't wait until the last minute. Don't stress yourself out by doing it all at once. That is great advice for things like big projects or studying for an exam, and some people will say the same sort of things about watching a television show. They'll tell you that you should watch each new episode when it premieres and then wait until until next week to find out what happens.  They may try and tell you that it's unhealthy to stay up into the wee hours of the night watching just one more episode, which we all know really means 4 more episodes, but here are the top three reasons I think it's better for you to take a whole weekend to watch an entire season of a show.

More emotionally connected

One of the things that draws you into a show and keeps you hooked is having a connection to the characters. No one wants to watch a show about someone they can't relate to. When you watch an entire season back to back you allow yourself to get to know a character on a whole different level than if you were to watch it as it premieres. You allow yourself to be fully immerse into the life of this character. You're allowing yourself to react to situations in real time with the characters. Emotions are always strongest when they are raw and that's what binge watching allows. You don't have time to logically think out how you feel. Your reaction is pure emotion the way a characters reaction would be.

Better understanding of the storyline

We all keep up with a lot of shows, especially if you're a TVR major like myself. Everyone has at least 10 shows to tell you about when you ask "what's your favorite show?" It's a lot to keep track of from season to season or even episode to episode. However if you watch each episode of a season back to back, you don't have time to forget. It's easier to remember what happened in the last episode when the last episode was just watched a few minutes ago. You'll have an easier time remembering small characters who only show up once in a blue moon because it won't have been that long since their last appearance.

Cliff hangers aren't as stressful

Life can be stressful. You've got your job, friends, classes, family, a significant other, and who knows what else piled high on your mind. You don't need the stress of a cliffhanger television episode weighing on your mind all week. When binge watching, this isn't an issue because the resolution to the cliff hanger is right there. All you have to do is press play and wait for the video to load. You don't have to daydream in class all the possible outcomes. You don't have to lay in bed and panic for the wellbeing of your favorite character. Just relax and find out what happens next


So next time you get hooked on a show, don't feel bad about watching that next episode right after it. Go ahead, stay in bed for a week straight and do nothing but watch an entire series. You deserve it.

Monday, January 27, 2014

Dexter: Friend or Foe?

My latest Netflix binge is Showtime’s hit drama series “Dexter.” I don’t typically enjoy shows with blood and gore, but “Dexter” is an exception.  The unique storyline, strong writing, and talented cast make this one of television’s best crime dramas. Protagonist Dexter Morgan is “born in blood” after witnessing his mother’s brutal murder as a toddler.  This traumatic event creates a darkness in Dexter, a thirst for blood only satisfied with murder.  Dexter’s adoptive father Harry teaches him a moral code to protect his secret and survive with the rest of the world.  “Dexter” challenges our own code of ethics and morals as we try to determine the true essence of Dexter’s character.
Dexter is a self-described monster who spends his entire life faking normalcy. He claims to have no emotion or conscience, and tries to fake emotion to seem more human. Dexter finds comfort in Harry’s code and nurtures his evil streak. His killings become ceremonious -- a sacred ritual where he feels alive. Harry’s code forbids killing innocents, so Dexter uses his forensics job with Miami-Metro Homicide to discreetly hunt down murderers to put under his own knife. He twists his darkness into a better evil.
I think most would agree that someone responsible for dozens of murders doesn’t quite fit the bill for a classically ‘good person.’  Anyone finding satisfaction in murder is clearly mentally unstable and a danger to society. But Dexter isn’t killing just anyone. He only targets other killers. The audience recognizes these facts, and chooses to root for Dexter. Sure, he’s a serial killer, but does that make him pure evil? He’s much more than a serial killer -- he’s a loving father, husband, and brother, and he’s doing his best to keep everyone happy and safe. I’m not sure if killing murderers classifies Dexter as good or bad, but he’s not as evil as he believes. Dexter’s blind obedience to the code proves to be one of his biggest weaknesses.  Harry told Dexter he could never change, and would always have to hide his true self. The code restricted Dexter’s individual growth over the years, but he very slowly throughout the show realizes he’s been a slave to the code. In a way, he was forced into this lifestyle. 
Even though he denies having emotion, we know he’s only fooling himself.  Part of Dexter’s kill ritual pays tribute to the victims of his target as he explains to the criminal why he’s going to end his or her life. This proves Dexter has some sense of right and wrong, indicating he does have a conscience after all. Unfortunately, having a conscience doesn’t make you a good person by default. Which begs the questions, is Dexter more good than he is evil? Are his actions justified? Or has Dexter manipulated viewers into thinking he’s more human than he really is?

Friday, May 3, 2013

You Win Or You Die

Lately I've been getting into the smash HBO series Game of Thrones.  This epic saga based on the novels of George R. R. Martin, is an fantasy series on HBO created by David Benioff and D. B. Weiss to become a massive success and fan favorite.  Season 3 is in the midst right now and it's been an epic battle and quest for power and knowledge every episode.  I'm really enjoying this series, even though it's a little different than my usual programs.

Right now, Game of Thrones is in it's 3rd season (it was picked up for it's 3rd season just 9 days after premiering it's 2nd season) and is an adaptation of the 3rd book in the series.  The cast and characters are all incredibly dangerous and fascinating which makes the show so intriguing.  I can honestly say (with out reading the books of course) that at this point in the show ANYONE could die.  This is highly unlikely for a TV show to kill off it's main characters but the show has done it before and would not be a surprise.  The premise of the show obviously revolves around a fictional fantasy world where kings and queens ruled the land, so naturally the goal of the majority of characters is to become the king.  And I can say it's a very safe bet that any one of the characters has a rightful power for the throne.



Some of the favorites on the show include Peter Dinklage as Tyrion the women-crazed son and imp of a very wealthy family who strives for the kingdom; Emilia Clarke as Daenerys Targaryan the bad-ass blonde dragon trainer; and Kit Harrington as Jon Snow the young and hunky bastard-son who's gone on to fight in a brotherhood army.  (Emilia Clarke is my favorite - I actually met her when she was starring on Broadway!)




The show brings on a huge cast of characters yet does a wonderful job of including them and weaving in story lines. (Unlike Glee with all of their characters).  I will continue to watch this show for as long as it will go on for a while.  There are 5 books currently but 2 more in the works and they might split the books up into multiple seasons as they did for seasons 3 and 4 (both about the 3rd book).



Could HBO be onto something, but turning hit books into TV shows rather than movies? (True Blood is another example.)  Maybe Harry Potter should have been an HBO series?  But then again it probably wouldn't have had enough sex or nudity for HBO to pick it up in the first place!

Wednesday, April 3, 2013

Die Hard 5? <--- Really?

     Okay so one of the most well known acton series is the Die Hard series.  Bruce Willis plays the role of John McClane, a New York cop saving the world.  The first Die Hard movie was unlike anything the theaters have seen before.  The non stop action and comedic language that Bruce Willis is noted for makes this movie a classic in action movies.  Since the first movie came out 4 others have followed.  The second film was not as good as the first but they came back with a third where Samuel L. Jackson co-starred with Bruce Willis and was a slight continuation of the story line from the first movie.


<---FIRST MOVIE

     The story of John McClane ended in 1995 until in 2007 when a forth movie came out to try and re-amp the series that everyone loved.  Live free of Die Hard was a good forth movie for not filming anything in 12 years, but that should have been it, there is now a fifth Die Hard movie!  There is a sense of over kill that has hit this well known and respected series.  A Good Day to Die Hard has been hammered by the critics and the script is said to be uninspiring.  Making Bruce Willis look like a bad ass has been done before!!!  For most of the time on set, articles have said that Bruce Willis barely acted, he really didn't care at al about the film, the producers should have just stopped then, if your starring actor doesn't care about the movie then there should be no movie.
   

<---FIFTH MOVIE
(See the difference)



     I am disappointed in the sense that a fifth movie was done, they should have left the series at 4.

Thursday, February 14, 2013

Kiefer Sutherland

     My single favorite show of all time is 24.  The show follows the character Jack Bauer who is a federal agent that stops terrorists from destroying the country.  The idea of the show is that this terrorist attack takes place within the course of 24 hours.  Each episode is an hour long and the show builds on itself with worse and worse things happening while Jack Bauer saves the day whether he gets into trouble or not.  The character of Bauer is an extremely well trained fearless person who will do whatever it takes to save his country which rarely thanks him or pays him back.  The show is extremely well casted and should go down in television history as one of the best.
     The show first aired in 2001 on Fox and was an immediate hit.  I started watching the show during its second season and I fell in love.  The show aired for 8 seasons over the course of 9 years because of the writers strike in 2007-2008.  This was Sutherland's break through TV show that received 9 awards for through many different ceremonies and 7 of the awards were for Sutherland's performance.  The show also received countless nominations for awards especially during seasons 4 and 5.

     Since the show ended in 2010 Sutherland has been playing small roles in a few movies and has made some cameo appearances.  His latest work is staring in a new television series called Touch which is also aired by Fox.  I have not seen the show yet but maybe I will start watching the second season and love it just like 24, I highly doubt something like that will happen but I love Kiefer as an actor.

Wednesday, February 6, 2013

     The Sci-Fi television and movie series Star Trek is releasing a new movie in May.  This series first began in 1966 and has since grown into a world of its own.  With 6 different television series' and 12 different movies the Star Trek franchise may soon be hitting the end of its run.  The latest movie is the sequel to a new series of movies that has predated everything we have seen before.  The characters take up the rolls of the original cast of Captain Kirk traveling the galaxy with his crew and starship, but the crew is much younger.  The series shows a lot of the back story of the characters in what was developed 40 years ago in the original series.  The latest series is action packed and emphasizing the special effects that was not there 40 years ago.
     Since its beginning Star Trek has had loyal fans who enjoy the development of new ideas and new series'.  The creativity of the episodes where we meet new species with different abilities and freak looking faces inspired the development of many other Sci-Fi series'.  The franchise has participated in the creative ability to develop other life forms with social issues and emotions similar to our own.  The character development of the relationships between the different species is one of the fine points in the Star Trek series, main point being Kirks relationship with Spock.

I hope that the producers at CBS and director, JJ Abrams, continue to keep the story line as one of the main parts in the Star Trek series.  Many loyal fans are excited about the new movie and latest series but fear for what might happen to the timeline and history that the Star trek series has developed.



Sunday, November 25, 2012

Two Plots Are Better Than One : Dexter and Series Television

I've noticed there are two types of shows on television, the first is shows that have concrete main characters but a new, unrelated plot every time .  These types of shows can be watched out of order with no actually progression of an overall plot.  This type of television show can usually be seen in children's programs for example "Spongebob" or "The Rugrats."  However as I have gotten older I have noticed another type of television programing as I started to become more interested in series television.
    The first television series that has gotten my attention enough to buy the first season DVD and start from the beginning, in order of the series, is "Dexter".  As I came to the completion of the first season I have started to notice a pattern in how the show is formatted.  For every episode there is an individual sub-plot (in this case a bad person Dexter must kill) and also an overarching plot pulling on pervious episodes and the episodes of the future (for example  Dexter's love life and the mystery of Ice Truck Serial Killer).  Once I noticed this pattern I began to think of other popular television shows (everything from Nickelodeon's Avatar to Glee to Spartacus)  and they all seem to follow this same format to one extent or another.
      I had to then ask myself why?  Well as a scriptwriter I looked at this from a storyline standpoint the sub-plot keeps every episode interesting and engaging for an audience that may not be familiar with the show but also heightens the engagement of dedicated followers.  The overarching plot however is what creates the "show followers" and drive to wait and watch the next episodes.  I believe this equates to the marketing of the show in a way.  The fact that a television show can be enjoyed by someone new to it is equally as important as to entertain someone who has watched it from the start.  Seeing a random episode of Dexter is what got me to start over from the beginning in order to understand what exactly was going on.  The usage of two story-lines to in a way to attract new watchers while furthering the entertainment of followers of the series seems to be extremely effective.
     Another interesting point I would like to add is about the story structure of each episode.  The basic outline of a conventional story is supposed to have an introduction, rising action, conflict, climax, falling action, and a conclusion…however as I have looked further into series television (or at least in the case of Dexter) this does not seem to be the case.  I feel as though every sub-plot follows this basic outline curve however the overarching plot provides it's most heightened sense of emotion at the end of every singular episode.  This climax at the conclusion if you will is what keeps audiences coming back and insights feeling of personal investment and connection within a series television program, turning first-timers into followers.
     It would seem from my experience and my research into series television programs this story-line format is at the core for creating a successful televisions series.  I have found that although some shows such as certain sitcoms and children's shows work on a per-episode basis, the shows that acquire the most "hype" and engage the audience most fully are those that utilize this idea that two plots are better than one.  After taking time to verbalize all of my thoughts and as someone who is interested in series television and the television business I have found that taking time to evaluate my own personal reactions as an audience may help to understand how audiences I may one day market to work as well.

 

Friday, October 19, 2012

Treatment for Johnson's Jewelry

This is a treatment I wrote for a web series.  I wanted to post it on here to get some feedback on it.  Thanks!


Johnson’s Jewelry
Tyler Chadwick

TREATMENT OCTOBER 16TH, 2012


OVERVIEW:

Johnson’s Jewelry” is a lighthearted family sitcom web series that follows the Johnson Family as they try to run a family jewelry store with little knowledge of the jewelry business besides the mothers experience in making craft jewelry.  The family experiences many humorous trials and tribulations while trying to start up and operate a successful business while dealing with stiff competition from the other jewelry store in town.  Throughout their journey, they learn about each other through missteps they make in their business and hijinks they pull on their local competitor.  While there are serious undertones in this series that deal with the bad economy, being without a job, trying to find a career, and support your family, Johnson’s Jewelry follows a dysfunctional, yet loving family’s journey to create their own family business and legacy.

CHARACTER SET-UP:

The story follows 45 year old, John Johnson and his family: his wife Jill (42), his older son John Jr. (20), and his younger daughter Jessica (16).  John is a failed Computer salesman of 20 years and was recently fired from his job.  He is a smart man but lacks social awareness and common sense.  His wife Jill, a pushover stay at home mom who loves jewelry and crafts, convinces John to use their retirement and savings fund to open a jewelry store.  John decides that it’s a good idea and he can apply his computer sales experience to computer.  His son Jr., as they call him, is a college dropout and plays in a crappy garage band.  His daughter Jessica is the smart and successful one in the family, sometimes to smart for her own good.  She is a start athlete in volleyball and a scholar with high ambitious but is arrogant sometimes and is a narcissist.  The family fights a lot, always more playful than serious, but are considered the protagonists in the story.  Some episodes will find certain family members as the antagonists but that wont last more than an episode at a time because there is never any real tension.

The true antagonist of the story is Bobby O’Brian of the Jewelry Palace.  Bobby has a pompous, egotistical, and narcissistic way about him and refers to himself as the Jewelry King.  He is well known for his annoying commercials that air on Television and Radio.  Up until the Johnson’s start their jewelry business, Bobby had the only jewelry shop in town and now the Johnson’s are in direct competition with his “empire”.  He makes many trips to the Johnson’s shop to provoke the Johnsons, trying to ruin their business and always trying to shut the Johnson’s business down.  As a family, the Johnson’s decide to constantly prank the “Jewelry King” as they become rival businesses, always creating trouble with each other to see who has the better jewelry store.  Jr. usually leads these pranking attempts while Jessica has to be corralled over time to join in with the family’s activities. 

This will all take place in Lancaster, PA, a suburb of Philadelphia, PA, and Harrisburg, PA.  Lancaster is a fairly metropolitan, yet suburban town that is famous for it’s Amish people, which will add to some of the humor in the web series.  We meet this family just as John is getting fired from his Computer Salesman job.


STORY:

The story starts on a medium shot of John Johnson and you hear the words in the background, “You will never work in the computer business again.  You have disgraced this company for the last time. You are fired!”  This is the audience’s first look at John, painting him as a failed computer salesman and by his overexpressed emotions from the few shots in the beginning, he is already being painted as a goofy guy who hasn’t succeeded at much in his life; always getting new, well paying jobs, and then somehow screwing them up. 

The next scene is John arriving at his typical average American home to his wife and two children, who are going about their everyday business.   While Jill cooks, Jessica and Jr. are in the midst of a heated argument and from it, you get the sense that this is a daily thing.  John then breaks the news to his family about losing, yet another job.  Both of his children just kind of sigh and walk away because they have seen their father fail many times before.  Jill tries to console John by telling him that he can find another job like he has before but John seems fairly distraught.

This fades out and then fades back in to an overhead shot of John and Jill in bed with the lights off showing that they both are close to finding sleep.  But then, Jill turns to John saying that she has an idea.  John, half asleep, agrees to hear her idea out but it is apparent that he is much more concerned with falling asleep.  Jill begins to talk about all of the crafts that she does and all of this new jewelry that she’s been making, mainly out of necessity because they don’t have the money to buy the extremely expensive Jewelry Palace downtown.  She tells John how all of her friends love her jewelry and wish that there was a place in town that sold more inexpensive, nice jewelry.  She then pitches the idea to John and in his stupor, he agrees that it would be a good idea. 

When he awakes to an empty bed the following morning, he stumbles into the kitchen to see books, papers, charts, posters, everywhere throughout the kitchen and living room with Jill sitting at the center of it all writing furiously on a piece of note paper.  When she looks up to see John’s astonished face, she tells him that she’s been working all night and morning on a business plan and idea and she’s already found a place that they could buy to put the business in, and all they would need to do is get a loan from the bank.  John, tries to calmly talk with his wife about how he was asleep last night and thinks he should try and find another job.  Jill clearly becomes distraught, and with a few tears, John gives in and says that he will read through her material and look at the building with her. 

They cut to a scene of them looking at an extremely crappy old gas station store that has hundreds of rodents living in it, chipping paint, caved in ceiling tiles, dirt everywhere, and many other things that are aesthetically pleasing about it.  Throughout the walkthrough with the realtor, Jill tries to put an overwhelmingly positive spin on everything, even though it is clearly a mess.  After all is said and done, they go ask the bank for alone to start the business which ensues into another funny scene of them begging the bank and entering into a back and forth negotiation with multiple people at the bank before they prevail. 

The first episode ends with them getting the keys to the place and bringing their kids with them to unlock it.  The kids have not visited the place yet so when the parents open up the doors and let them inside, the kids freak out.  The last shot will be a tight medium shot on both of the kids’ faces, clearly astonished that their parents would do something so stupid. 

In the following episodes, the family cleans up the jewelry store, starts compiling an inventory of jewelry, and meets the Jewelry King of the Jewelry Palace who is very upset that they have ruined his empire over the Lancaster Jewelry market.   In the episodes to follow, he will begin to do things to try and ruin the Johnson’s plans: everything from delaying shipments, planting mice in their store, and paying people to try and sell the Johnson’s fake gold and jewelry.  The Johnson’s will fire back, with pranks led by Jr. that are meant to get even with Bobby O’Brian, the Jewelry King.  

Copyright Tyler Chadwick October 16th, 2012