Showing posts with label Showtime. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Showtime. Show all posts

Thursday, April 9, 2015

'episodes' is my new favorite show!!!


I recently finished watching the first two seasons of Episodes.  This series stars two British actors Tamsin Greig & Stephen Mangan.  This series also stars Matt LeBlanc! This show is broadcast here in the US on Showtime.  In the United Kingdom this show is broadcast on BBC Two.  It is a British/American sitcom that I am really enjoying!

This Photo described what I thought going into the first episode of Episodes:
This show starts with a married couple Sean Lincoln [Stephen Mangan] & Beverly Lincoln [Tamsin Greig].  In the show they're writers and producers for this show in the United Kingdom called Lyman's Boys. Their show just won another British Academy Televsion Award.  At the award ceremony Merc Lapidus [John Pankow] talks to them about making an American version of Lyman's Boys. He tells them he will get them a house to stay in at while in LA and gives them deals they can't refuse. 
Merc is the head of what shows gets broadcast on a major network.  Merc later gets Matt LeBlanc [Matt LeBlanc] to join the team and star as a head master.  Matt LeBlanc is supposed to be playing himself in this series. 
Being a fan of Friends I love when Matt brings up things from Friends during the show!
Here is a perfect trailer of Episodes:  

My favorite interactions are the ones between Sean and Matt as well as anyone with Merc in it! Sean and Matt develop this bromance that was fun to watch.  Beverly and Matt were not friends at first and never have been in an episode I have seen.  
Merc is the biggest sweet talker ever. He literally tells people whatever they want to hear all the time. He cares more about making money than making a good show.  He is intense and his emotions change so fast, I laugh in almost every scene he is in!
I give this show a 8/10 and I will continue to watch the rest of Episodes soon. 

Monday, January 27, 2014

Dexter: Friend or Foe?

My latest Netflix binge is Showtime’s hit drama series “Dexter.” I don’t typically enjoy shows with blood and gore, but “Dexter” is an exception.  The unique storyline, strong writing, and talented cast make this one of television’s best crime dramas. Protagonist Dexter Morgan is “born in blood” after witnessing his mother’s brutal murder as a toddler.  This traumatic event creates a darkness in Dexter, a thirst for blood only satisfied with murder.  Dexter’s adoptive father Harry teaches him a moral code to protect his secret and survive with the rest of the world.  “Dexter” challenges our own code of ethics and morals as we try to determine the true essence of Dexter’s character.
Dexter is a self-described monster who spends his entire life faking normalcy. He claims to have no emotion or conscience, and tries to fake emotion to seem more human. Dexter finds comfort in Harry’s code and nurtures his evil streak. His killings become ceremonious -- a sacred ritual where he feels alive. Harry’s code forbids killing innocents, so Dexter uses his forensics job with Miami-Metro Homicide to discreetly hunt down murderers to put under his own knife. He twists his darkness into a better evil.
I think most would agree that someone responsible for dozens of murders doesn’t quite fit the bill for a classically ‘good person.’  Anyone finding satisfaction in murder is clearly mentally unstable and a danger to society. But Dexter isn’t killing just anyone. He only targets other killers. The audience recognizes these facts, and chooses to root for Dexter. Sure, he’s a serial killer, but does that make him pure evil? He’s much more than a serial killer -- he’s a loving father, husband, and brother, and he’s doing his best to keep everyone happy and safe. I’m not sure if killing murderers classifies Dexter as good or bad, but he’s not as evil as he believes. Dexter’s blind obedience to the code proves to be one of his biggest weaknesses.  Harry told Dexter he could never change, and would always have to hide his true self. The code restricted Dexter’s individual growth over the years, but he very slowly throughout the show realizes he’s been a slave to the code. In a way, he was forced into this lifestyle. 
Even though he denies having emotion, we know he’s only fooling himself.  Part of Dexter’s kill ritual pays tribute to the victims of his target as he explains to the criminal why he’s going to end his or her life. This proves Dexter has some sense of right and wrong, indicating he does have a conscience after all. Unfortunately, having a conscience doesn’t make you a good person by default. Which begs the questions, is Dexter more good than he is evil? Are his actions justified? Or has Dexter manipulated viewers into thinking he’s more human than he really is?

Thursday, November 14, 2013

Weeding Through Gender Roles


Weeds is a dark, suspenseful American comedy-drama series that aired on Showtime on August 7, 2005. The show was created by Jeni Kohan and produced by Tilted Productions in association with Lionsgate Television. The show earned Showtime their highest ratings and has received numerous awards including two Satellite Awards, one Golden Globe Award, a Writers Guild of America Award, a Young Artist Award, and two Emmy Awards.

The show is most known for its central character, Nancy Botwin (Mary-Louise Parker), a widowed mother of two boys. After her husband dies of a tragic heart attack, Nancy struggles raising her two children and supporting their current lifestyle in Agrestic, California. Agrestic, which is the main focus in the show’s popular title sequence, is famous for its similar tiled-roof houses and over-involved soccer moms. Nancy goes against the stereotypical designer wearing, child caring mother when she decides that the only possible way to maintain her families’ upscale lifestyle is to deal marijuana. This, of course, plunges her and her loved ones into pure chaos and a long, complicated string of illegal activities. Throughout the show’s eight seasons, Nancy goes through the complex drama associated with growing and selling marijuana as a high-end competitor. Her drama includes that of an ordinary housewife. She packs lunches for her kids and deals with common teenage angst. At the same time, she goes through the drama of being a dealer, such as life-threatening arguments with competitors, the risks of smuggling substances, and taking a bullet to the head by a DEA’s revengeful son.
Despite the drama, the most fascinating aspect of the show is the role of a woman heroin who is constantly failing her family. Nancy Botwin has pushed the boundaries of most mother characters that star in comedy-dramas. In most series, if a mother character is rebellious and involved in illegal matters they are usually foiled or show guilt. In the past, mothers have merely shown assistance to the main male character. In modern day television, mothers are most often displayed as heroines with a fault, able to take care of their families but often messing up in a humorous and relatable way. However, Nancy Botwin breaks all of the stereotypes used to form woman characters on television. Nancy, to say simply, is a 40-something girl in a woman’s body, allowing greed to steer her decisions and avoiding every possibility to display responsibility. Often showing too much skin, wearing shorts too short, guzzling too much iced coffee, and cursing way too much, Nancy has mastered the ability to change the image of woman and make a badass image of herself in the drug business.
Nancy’s character has often been critiqued as “the worst mother on television”. When one of her sons becomes a major drug dealer at only 16 and her even younger son kills her main competitor, it’s easy to see how she earned this title. However, what makes her so much different than famous, popular television characters like Tony Soprano? What makes her a less suited parent and a less-liked individual? Ultimately, it is her gender that makes her parenting more surprising to viewers. Although characters such as Tony Soprano have made equally questioning decisions that have endangered their loved ones, Nancy’s actions have built her an unmistakably negative reputation as a poor role model rather than a simply entertaining, misunderstood individual. Specifically, Nancy’s gender makes her character a challenging concept for audience members to comprehend. Although she is a maternal character who truly loves her children, she is not relatable like other woman on comedy-dramas. Instead, Nancy’s problems do not revolve around what will be placed on the dinner table or how she will help her children with their homework. Instead, her life is filled with decisions surrounding drug trades, dangerous enemies and other issues that are difficult for almost every mother to relate to. In the end, Nancy proves that being a strong woman does not pertain to a man's common portrayal of what a woman should be. Instead, Nancy proves that a woman can be portrayed as any image of her choosing, no matter how impossible or how little society approves of it. Her choices may be far from ethical but playing dirty is not specifically a man's approach to life, but a human one.
Unlike most television characters that indulge in rebellious activities and then realize the negativity of their actions, Nancy fails to recognize her wrongdoings. Instead, she never considers obtaining a real, steady, legal occupation or dedicating all her time as a housewife who serves her family. Instead, Nancy seeks out danger and finds absolute comfort in doing illegal and unexpected activities. The lure of the financial aspects that come from dealing marijuana keeps her from leaving the game and doing what is the safest for her family. Her spontaneous hookups with drug dealers, her on and off relationship with the law and the fact that she sells weed to young college students hints at a missing maternal attribute that almost all other mother characters have. All in all, Nancy creates a new face for mothers everywhere, suggesting that being a simple housewife and striving to complete maternal perfection is completely overrated. Nancy reveals the adventurous attributes that most housewives often keep hidden away in order to restore their good-natured reputation. It is refreshing to see a woman on television whose moment of weakness is greater than simply ruining dinner or forgetting to sign her child’s permission slip for their field trip. She may not be relatable in her drug-related actions, but it’s her moments of weakness and her frustration that make her fascinating to female viewers.
The series finale of Weeds correctly displayed how the consequences of Nancy’s actions effected her family. In the series finale, the show sped ahead a few years to reveal that Nancy had establish a well-received, famous, legal product, marijuana cigarettes known as Puff Dragons. In fact, the product is so successful that Starbucks gives Nancy an offer to buy her product. The rest of the episode focuses on her internal debate on whether or not to sell. Although the offer seems impossible to turn down, it is evident that all these years later, after failing her family time after time again, Nancy’s family has left, abandoned her to go their own ways. In fact, even her youngest son, Stevie, who was merely a baby last time we saw him, has begged to be sent to boarding school, fed up with the constant drama associated with his mother. In the end, Nancy sells the business, allowing everyone who has not been able to sever their ties, free. She’s achieved the goals she’s focused on the entire series. She became the most prominent dealer, she became rich, and she became successful due to the growing and selling of marijuana. However, as the show ends with a shot of her smoking a pot-cigarette on a stoop during a wintery afternoon, it is evident in her loneliness what she has given up.

Friday, September 27, 2013

Mark My Words: 'Masters of Sex' Will Change the Future of Television

For those of you haven't heard about Showtime's hot new drama, Masters of Sex is the real story of the sex study conducted by William Masters (played by Michael Sheen) and Virginia Johnson (played by Lizzy Caplan) in a time where even talking about sex was extremely taboo. It is a period piece, bringing us back to the late 50s aesthetically and culturally, but cannot possible be compared to Mad Men, as it reaches completely untouched territory.


Since The Sopranos, television drama has been in a violent-driven era. In terms of violence, television is flooded with adult content. And yes, there has been sexual adult content to a certain extent. Game of Thrones is the first show that comes to mind. But sex just happens to be in those shows. They do not revolve around it. With two monumental antiheroes, Dexter Morgan and Walter White, making their exit on the small screen, millions of television watchers are looking for the next big thing. And I promise you, Masters of Sex will be that thing. It's opening up so many doors in the television world: protagonists who are not heroes, are not antiheroes, but just naturally interesting and compelling. The television industry has gotten comfortable with using violence as a means for capturing viewers. And yes, it works. But we have to get out of this slump and continue progressing in television. Masters is going to do exactly that.

When I first heard that the show is about a sex study in which the two researchers actually observe sexual activity, I thought, "Okay, so Showtime picked up some extremely plot-elaborated porno...?" I had no plans on giving it a try. But after hearing such high remarks on the show, I decided to be brave and watch the pilot, which was released online two weeks before the premiere. I am very adamant about my three episode rule. When trying a new show, I have to watch three episodes before making any judgement, allowing sufficient time for them to show me what they've got. But halfway through the pilot, I was sold. It was nothing like I expected.

Masters successfully dove into the other half of adult content, and respectfully too, I might add. The show diverts from the real sexual graphicness that we assume we'll find. It takes place in the last 50s, a time so sexually clueless. William Masters is not a pervert, though risking the reputation, he's a scientist who believes we should be more aware of the way our body works. Secondly, the actual study is far less erotic than one would think. The study is conducted in a research hospital, so the lighting is not exactly sexy. Plus, the subjects in the study are hooked up to a bunch of wires, which actually is somewhat science fiction-esqe.

What I find so interesting is that we know where the show going. It isn't very hard to type the researchers names into Google and find out that they end up getting married. But it really doesn't seem to matter. It actual makes it all the more interesting to watch where they started and how their relationship, both professionally and romantically, grew over time. There's also no hiding how influential the study was. It was a major contributor to the openness of sexuality in the 60s and the feminist movement in the 70s. But quite frankly, those details make the story that much more appealing.

It's fascinating to see William Masters pioneer this study as he is very typical for a man of his time, even to an extreme when it comes to the way he interacts with women. He had no idea what he was about to discover and how that would completely change our society. His partner, Johnson, is also a fantastic character. She can almost be considered the first feminist. Johnson doesn't follow traditional ideas. For example, she doesn't understand why love and sex have to go together. Watching a woman without a degree be so vital to this study, where she finds herself becoming an equal partner and not an assistant, is really awesome. Not to mention, Sheen and Caplan are fantastic actors.



Masters of Sex is extremely refreshing to watch. It's a show about sex and birth and love, not war and death and rivalries. Hopefully it sets a new era of television drama, with stories that are naturally compelling without the need for darkness. I don't think the show will be for everyone, but it's definitely worth giving a chance. It officially premieres this Sunday at 10 pm on Showtime.

Friday, February 8, 2013

Does Anyone Even Watch This Show?

After recently getting a Showtime account, I was able to explore all of the wonderful TV shows and movies offered online and on the channel.  I have already watched all of Homeland so it was time for me to start another Showtime series that I could become addicted to.  That's when I decided to start watching Episodes.  Episodes stars one of my favorite comedic actors Matt LeBlanc of Friends fame.  The show even won him a Golden Globe last year for best actor in a comedy.  But after watching a few episodes, I realized....I think I might be the only person in the world who watches this show.  I have never heard anyone talk about it, nor have I seen any advertisements for it on other sites like Hulu, or TV Guide.  Could this be a diamond in the rough or is there a reason for its lack of viewership?




Frankly, I love the show.  It's a smart comedy about two British TV writers who move to L.A. and are forced to "Americanize" their show.  Episodes is unique in the fact that it is an American and British comedy, premiering on Showtime as well as on BBC 2.  The show was created by Jeffry Klarik (co-producer of Mad About You, and The Class) and his business and life partner (how cute!!) David Crane (co-creator of Friends).  I think the two have created an extremely witty show with a funny ensemble.  To be frank I probably would not have started watching this show if Matt LeBlanc and David Crane were not involved, because Friends is my all time favorite show.




Episodes follows around a married couple who have won yet another BAFTA award for their TV show about a headmaster at a boys boarding school.  A snobby, pompous LA producer has them come out to LA to produce the show, much to their dismay.  After casting Matt LeBlanc (who plays himself) as the headmaster things go downhill after everyone starts changing their show.  They change the plot of the show, and the cast and characters and chaos ensues.  Episodes has been renewed for a 3rd season, and I can't wait to continue watching the rest of the series on Showtime, hoping that someone else in the world will watch it with me and enjoy the quirky characters and silly plots just as much as I do.  I think one of the reasons I enjoy it so much is because it reminds me of what it's like to produce my own sitcom (Boys of 213 on ICTV check it out!) and I can relate to the producers in many ways.

Friday, November 9, 2012

Homeland.. Finally!

This week I finally started the television series Homeland. My friends have been after me, often telling me that this is one of the best shows on TV. Being a TV-R student I figured I had to see what all the talk was about.


Homeland, which was created by Gideon Raff and runs on Showtime, quickly draws you in with a compelling plot line. The first episode has many clips of main character Nicholas Brody, a Marine Sargent, held captive by al-Qaeda. After being imprisoned for eight years he is finally rescued by an American Delta Force raid. However, after so many years as a prisoner his life had been completely altered. As he returns home almost everything has changed with his family, and peoples perception of him. He is now a hero to the American people. His family, who assumed he was dead, now has the chance to build a relationship with their father/husband. However, the most interesting plot line is CIA agent Carrie Mathison, who has her own feelings about Brody. She has suspicion that Brody is coming to America as a possible terrorist threat and launches an investigation. The show creators have kept me guessing weather Brody is a hero or a terrorist. I am completely intrigued and will continue to watch more of this series in the upcoming weeks. I am officially hooked on my new show.

Friday, November 2, 2012

"Homeland" Opening

Showtime shows have some interesting opening credits. "Dexter" and it's opening makes use of some great cinematography and chilling sound effects to effectively creep the viewer out upon each viewing. But what about "Homeland" and it's opening credit sequence? Take a look at the video below. It has some of the clips from it's opening along with the music.

Using disorienting jazz music and a plethora of oddly placed diegetic sounds, this is easily one of the oddest opening credit sequences I've ever seen. The images don't help with my confusion either. Characters are shown standing in a maze and videos of the 9/11 attacks taking place also bring about more questions for me. Perhaps the credits are more important than I think in this show, but so far I have yet to see many correlations, yet. I'm about one episode away from finishing the first season, and if I am proven wrong, I will post the results here. But so far, the opening isn't my favorite, and I would prefer it if they tried to be a little less jarring with something the viewer watches at the beginning of every episode.

Friday, October 5, 2012

Opening Credits

This past Sunday the season premier of Dexter was on Showtime. In my house off campus, this is one of the house's favorite shows. After what seemed like forever, we were very pleased that Dexter was back on TV and we had a large viewing party in our living room for the premier. Most of us were avid Dexter fans and have seen every episode of the previous six seasons. However, there were a few people that came over that were new to the series. As the clock struck 9:00 PM the music began and the best intro and opening credits to a TV show began.



This may seem ridiculous but in my opinion the opening credits or the intro to a show is very important. Think about all of your favorite shows... Entourage has the Jane's Addiction song blaring, Breaking Bad has the Periodic Table, Weeds has the "Little Boxes" song, and Game of Thrones with the map of the realm. These introductions are something that sticks with us and something that prepares us for the show. In my opinion the opening credits are an important part of drawing the viewer into the show. Not  to gain viewers but to put the people that are actually viewing the show in the right mind set for the show.

No show does this better than Dexter. The creepy music in the background coupled with weird shots of the cutting of meat, Dexter shaving, and getting dressed, reminds you of how peculiar Dexter's character really is. It draws you back into the show and into the mind of a serial killer.

As the newcomers in our living room shuttered at the blood splatter from Dexter's razor, or the the knife cutting threw the piece of meat, the rest of just smiled because our favorite show had just drawn us back in for another season.