Reenactments and
documentaries have gone hand in hand since the inception of the genre.
Reenactments, although often unappreciated, take the viewer a step further than
just hearing the story being told; they place the audience into the story.
This, when done well, results in an unbelievable viewing experience that can
beautifully blend the lines between documentary and narrative film
making.
making.
In my opinion, When
talking about reenactments in documentaries you can really only start with one
film, Errol Morris’ 1988 film Thin Blue
Line. The Documentary is an investigation of the murder of a Dallas Police
officer, Robert Wood, in 1976. David
Harris testified that Randall Adams, who was with Harris the night of the
killing, was person guilty of shooting the officer in cold blood. The film
progresses to show the series of events, like poor timing, misinformation,
ulterior motives, and downright lies, that lead to a wrongful conviction. The
story behind the documentary is fascinating in and of its self and should be
viewed just for that, however for me the true gems of the film are the multiple reenactments of the murder. The
each reenactment is shown from a different witnesses’ point of view, and
changes slightly with each of their interpretations of the crime. This was done
so successfully that it allowed the audience to better understand the case,
separate facts from fiction for themselves, and come to their own conclusion
about who was actually guilty.
The
reenactments in Thin Blue Line are
vastly different from the reenactments of most film and television
documentaries. Having them shot in very low key lighting, and having characters
in question silhouetted gave the documentary’s cinematography an almost
Film-Noir feeling. These techniques are effectively used for a number of
reasons. First, and perhaps most obviously, it helps set the over all mood of
the film; uncertainty in regards to the case. The low-key lighting also adds a
stark contrast between the interviews and the reenactments; while the
silhouetted framing of the suspects reinforces the idea the viewer has limited
information about what actually happened. Ironically Thin Blue Line was not considered for Best Documentary, because
according to the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences the reenactments
made the movie “a fiction film,” not a documentary, I however strongly
disagree.
Another
documentary with reenactments worthy of mentioning is, my personal favorite
documentary, The Stories We Tell directed
by the talented actress, and arguably more talented writer and director Sarah Polley. The movie is multidimensional
and has many twists, turns, and subplots, but is for the most part about the
life of Sarah’s mother, Diane and an affair that she may or may not have had
which may or may not have produced Sarah. The movie also deals with her
family’s different interpretations and memories of the story and the past,
dealing with the main theme of the film, the faultiness and unreliability of
memory. The story of Sarah’s mother’s life is complexly beautiful, sorrowful
and somehow simultaneously joyful, and was portrayed excellently in the
reenactments.
Of cores, crappy reenactments can be just as
entertaining…
1 comment:
Great topic! The Thin Blue Line undoubtedly sports the best use of this technique in documentary filmmaking and I'm glad you mentioned Stories We Tell. That reveal toward the end that you allude to is such a brilliant move on Polley's part.
Although the re-enactments are in a more abstract sense, I would also add The Act of Killing to this discussion. Placing the subjects in the re-enactments and allowing them to have control over how their memories are represented makes for a very interesting dynamic in that film.
Post a Comment