Last week I
watched Lars Von Trier’s two part epic “Nymphomaniac”. I went into it thinking
it would be some old guy’s twisted fantasies of the perfect sexual woman
projected on to the screen but was quite surprised to find it had a lot more
depth. For one, it dealt with a rarely discussed issue in film of sex and
morality. In America these two things are almost always linked yet we do not
frequently examine this connection. Is sex inherently immoral? Why are women
cast out for having affairs and active sex lives, while men are praised for
this?
The main character of the film, Joe, is a self-proclaimed
nymphomaniac, and the film begins with her saying she is a truly horrible
person who does not deserve to be alive. She then goes on to tell a man, Seligman,
who found her in an alley about the illicit sexual exploits that make up her
life. He continually asserts that her
guilt is misguided and that were she a man, she would not have been punished
the way she was. This is a perspective not many films include.
For example, as a teenager Joe and her best friend B have a
competition to see how many people they can have sex with while on a single
train ride. The way Joe describes it is a morally corrupt disgusting act, whereas
Seligman points out that were a man searching for sex on a train, and pursuing
multiple women, no one would even think twice about it.
Another way the film points out this double standard is when
Joe leaves her family when she cannot stay loyal to her husband and is made to
feel like a horrible person for this, while many men even in the movie leave
their spouse and child due to infidelity. Because she is a woman and a mother,
her leaving her family is particularly horrible. This too, Seligman points out.
Overall, to see a woman talk this openly and explicitly
about sex, and be supported for it, is a bold statement for a film to make.
No comments:
Post a Comment